2026 Girls Soccer Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Soccer Articles
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
APR | OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 1 | 16-1-1 | 1 | 748.689 | 1 | 1049.857 |
|
2 | 2 | 13-1-2 | 3 | 736.393 | 2 | 1029.193 |
|
3 | 3 | 17-1-1 | 2 | 748.363 | 3 | 1007.287 |
|
4 | 4 | 13-1-1 | 5 | 668.869 | 4 | 894.069 |
|
5 | 5 | 13-4-1 | 4 | 671.205 | 5 | 881.627 |
|
6 | 6 | 11-5-1 | 6 | 645.795 | 7 | 763.010 |
|
7 | 7 | 9-4-4 | 7 | 624.829 | 8 | 761.373 |
|
8 | 8 | 9-5-2 | 8 | 613.314 | 9 | 757.693 |
|
9 | 9 | 10-2-3 | 13 | 595.242 | 6 | 809.977 |
|
10 | 10 | 10-6 | 9 | 610.643 | 11 | 734.799 |
|
11 | 11 | 10-4-1 | 11 | 607.487 | 10 | 735.221 |
|
12 | 12 | 8-5-4 | 10 | 609.772 | 12 | 726.807 |
|
13 | 13 | 10-2-5 | 15 | 578.506 | 15 | 680.677 |
|
14 | 14 | 9-5-2 | 12 | 596.666 | 18 | 650.486 |
|
15 | 15 | 10-4-2 | 19 | 557.749 | 13 | 705.295 |
|
17 | 16 | 10-5-2 | 16 | 577.381 | 16 | 672.423 |
|
17 | 7-7-1 | 17 | 574.056 | 17 | 652.625 | |
|
18 | 18 | 7-7-3 | 14 | 590.581 | 20 | 634.909 |
|
19 | 10-3-2 | 22 | 548.899 | 14 | 688.222 | |
|
20 | 7-4-4 | 18 | 568.309 | 19 | 636.275 | |
|
19 | 21 | 7-8-1 | 21 | 552.511 | 22 | 609.204 |
|
16 | 22 | 9-5-1 | 20 | 554.494 | 25 | 553.171 |
|
23 | 8-5-2 | 29 | 509.331 | 21 | 611.423 | |
|
24 | 6-8-1 | 26 | 523.964 | 24 | 561.021 | |
|
25 | 7-4-3 | 28 | 516.054 | 23 | 587.192 | |
|
20 | 26 | 7-7-2 | 24 | 539.340 | 27 | 541.502 |
|
21 | 27 | 5-9-2 | 23 | 539.788 | 28 | 512.331 |
|
22 | 28 | 7-8-2 | 27 | 521.384 | 26 | 543.515 |
|
29 | 7-6-2 | 25 | 524.247 | 32 | 485.776 | |
|
23 | 30 | 8-7-1 | 32 | 477.480 | 29 | 505.691 |
|
31 | 4-9-2 | 30 | 499.416 | 31 | 487.827 | |
|
24 | 32 | 8-6-3 | 35 | 454.429 | 30 | 499.786 |
|
33 | 6-8-1 | 31 | 484.159 | 34 | 385.382 | |
|
34 | 5-6-2 | 34 | 462.780 | 33 | 439.193 | |
|
35 | 4-9-2 | 33 | 465.407 | 36 | 360.987 | |
|
36 | 3-8-3 | 36 | 420.143 | 35 | 378.320 | |
|
37 | 3-9-2 | 37 | 418.537 | 37 | 355.347 | |
|
38 | 2-8-4 | 40 | 383.812 | 38 | 262.029 | |
|
39 | 4-10 | 39 | 393.601 | 39 | 231.671 | |
|
40 | 1-13-1 | 38 | 413.217 | 40 | 225.991 | |
|
41 | 1-13 | 41 | 364.014 | 42 | 157.367 | |
|
42 | 5-9-1 | 43 | 333.810 | 41 | 198.068 | |
|
43 | 1-13-1 | 42 | 351.374 | 43 | 117.766 | |
|
44 | 0-14 | 44 | 323.279 | 44 | 55.108 | |
|
45 | 1-13 | 45 | 256.749 | 45 | -5.592 |
Legend
APR: The Adjusted Playoff Ranking (APR) is the bracket seed adjusted from final frozen ranking to remove first round same league matchup conflicts and to accommodate league champion guarantees.OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Effective Impact on RPI
The RPI formula uses a 1:1.86 ratio of WWP:OWP, the effective impact on a team's RPI for 6A Girls Soccer was:| Max | Min | Range | Effect | Weight | Impact | |
| WWP | 0.971 | 0.000 | 0.971 | 0.971 | 1.605 | 61% |
| OWP | 0.647 | 0.306 | 0.341 | 0.634 | 39% |
| Team Name & Logo League |
APR | OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 1 | 14-2 | 2 | 684.694 | 1 | 937.019 |
|
2 | 2 | 15-2 | 1 | 703.831 | 2 | 922.725 |
|
3 | 3 | 13-1-3 | 3 | 643.551 | 3 | 870.278 |
|
4 | 4 | 14-3-1 | 4 | 606.807 | 4 | 798.388 |
|
5 | 5 | 9-5-2 | 5 | 588.671 | 6 | 682.984 |
|
9 | 6 | 12-4-2 | 7 | 576.185 | 5 | 713.585 |
|
11 | 7 | 12-3-3 | 6 | 577.539 | 7 | 664.324 |
|
10 | 8 | 8-6-2 | 9 | 560.687 | 9 | 639.866 |
|
6 | 9 | 8-7-1 | 8 | 564.839 | 11 | 601.860 |
|
12 | 10 | 11-4-1 | 12 | 545.139 | 8 | 654.550 |
|
16 | 11 | 7-5-4 | 10 | 558.759 | 10 | 629.681 |
|
13 | 12 | 8-7 | 11 | 552.679 | 12 | 589.700 |
|
7 | 13 | 9-6-2 | 14 | 528.791 | 13 | 588.613 |
|
8 | 14 | 7-8-1 | 15 | 517.976 | 14 | 565.268 |
|
14 | 15 | 8-8 | 13 | 535.142 | 16 | 520.303 |
|
16 | 6-6-2 | 17 | 495.028 | 15 | 524.940 | |
|
15 | 17 | 4-9-3 | 16 | 512.675 | 18 | 475.459 |
|
18 | 5-7-4 | 18 | 485.067 | 17 | 505.577 | |
|
19 | 4-8-2 | 19 | 478.912 | 19 | 434.981 | |
|
20 | 5-9 | 22 | 430.970 | 21 | 401.270 | |
|
21 | 6-9 | 20 | 450.655 | 23 | 372.920 | |
|
22 | 7-6-1 | 24 | 419.252 | 20 | 414.857 | |
|
23 | 3-6-5 | 21 | 435.867 | 24 | 372.074 | |
|
24 | 6-6-2 | 25 | 414.949 | 22 | 387.682 | |
|
25 | 3-10-2 | 23 | 419.381 | 26 | 357.486 | |
|
26 | 6-7 | 26 | 413.466 | 25 | 364.933 | |
|
27 | 4-7-3 | 27 | 396.117 | 27 | 316.358 | |
|
28 | 3-10-2 | 29 | 385.222 | 28 | 265.352 | |
|
29 | 3-10-1 | 28 | 392.871 | 29 | 228.082 | |
|
30 | 1-11-2 | 31 | 346.698 | 30 | 216.502 | |
|
31 | 0-13-1 | 30 | 378.151 | 32 | 195.631 | |
|
32 | 2-11-1 | 32 | 339.501 | 31 | 215.375 | |
|
33 | 2-10-2 | 34 | 324.901 | 33 | 145.547 | |
|
34 | 0-14 | 33 | 330.719 | 35 | 86.742 | |
|
35 | 1-11-2 | 35 | 318.268 | 34 | 116.318 | |
|
36 | 2-12-1 | 36 | 316.693 | 36 | 84.150 |
Legend
APR: The Adjusted Playoff Ranking (APR) is the bracket seed adjusted from final frozen ranking to remove first round same league matchup conflicts and to accommodate league champion guarantees.OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Effective Impact on RPI
The RPI formula uses a 1:1.86 ratio of WWP:OWP, the effective impact on a team's RPI for 5A Girls Soccer was:| Max | Min | Range | Effect | Weight | Impact | |
| WWP | 0.943 | 0.000 | 0.943 | 0.943 | 1.397 | 67% |
| OWP | 0.597 | 0.353 | 0.245 | 0.455 | 33% |
| Team Name & Logo League |
APR | OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 1 | 15-1-1 | 2 | 690.519 | 1 | 886.975 |
|
2 | 2 | 14-3-1 | 1 | 707.556 | 3 | 868.898 |
|
3 | 3 | 13-1-2 | 4 | 657.146 | 2 | 868.916 |
|
4 | 4 | 19-0 | 3 | 680.357 | 4 | 864.226 |
|
5 | 5 | 11-2-3 | 5 | 630.912 | 5 | 781.853 |
|
6 | 6 | 11-5-1 | 6 | 598.065 | 6 | 716.854 |
|
9 | 7 | 12-4-1 | 7 | 593.177 | 7 | 696.478 |
|
7 | 8 | 11-4 | 9 | 566.141 | 8 | 654.624 |
|
8 | 9 | 11-4-1 | 8 | 584.317 | 9 | 640.277 |
|
10 | 10 | 11-4-2 | 10 | 561.794 | 11 | 613.395 |
|
11 | 11 | 8-5 | 13 | 533.214 | 10 | 623.969 |
|
12 | 12 | 10-4-1 | 12 | 547.918 | 12 | 590.752 |
|
13 | 13 | 9-7 | 11 | 551.337 | 13 | 564.629 |
|
2 | 14 | 6-7-2 | 14 | 525.144 | 14 | 539.336 |
|
14 | 15 | 7-7-2 | 16 | 505.478 | 15 | 526.514 |
|
3 | 16 | 6-4-4 | 15 | 518.236 | 17 | 490.928 |
|
17 | 7-7-1 | 17 | 494.802 | 16 | 504.620 | |
|
15 | 18 | 7-6-2 | 18 | 493.087 | 18 | 475.408 |
|
7 | 19 | 8-6-1 | 19 | 474.239 | 19 | 445.896 |
|
20 | 6-8-1 | 20 | 439.563 | 20 | 365.841 | |
|
21 | 3-10 | 21 | 432.824 | 21 | 344.788 | |
|
12 | 22 | 4-9-2 | 24 | 417.399 | 22 | 343.990 |
|
16 | 23 | 4-11 | 23 | 425.349 | 24 | 295.952 |
|
14 | 24 | 4-8-2 | 22 | 426.333 | 25 | 287.439 |
|
16 | 25 | 6-7-2 | 25 | 407.983 | 23 | 330.418 |
|
26 | 3-10-2 | 27 | 377.105 | 26 | 285.046 | |
|
27 | 4-9-1 | 26 | 393.048 | 27 | 273.072 | |
|
28 | 3-10 | 29 | 360.232 | 28 | 269.443 | |
|
29 | 1-13 | 28 | 364.147 | 29 | 193.044 | |
|
9 | 30 | 1-13 | 30 | 352.638 | 30 | 154.503 |
|
31 | 1-12-1 | 31 | 331.071 | 32 | 107.595 | |
|
32 | 2-11-1 | 33 | 315.929 | 31 | 111.289 | |
|
33 | 0-13-1 | 32 | 316.488 | 34 | 54.566 | |
|
8 | 34 | 0-11-2 | 34 | 288.826 | 33 | 65.712 |
|
35 | 0-13-1 | 35 | 271.641 | 35 | 4.506 |
Legend
APR: The Adjusted Playoff Ranking (APR) is the bracket seed adjusted from final frozen ranking to remove first round same league matchup conflicts and to accommodate league champion guarantees.OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Effective Impact on RPI
The RPI formula uses a 1:1.86 ratio of WWP:OWP, the effective impact on a team's RPI for 4A Girls Soccer was:| Max | Min | Range | Effect | Weight | Impact | |
| WWP | 1.000 | 0.030 | 0.970 | 0.970 | 1.491 | 65% |
| OWP | 0.632 | 0.351 | 0.281 | 0.521 | 35% |
| Team Name & Logo League |
APR | OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 1 | 19-0 | 1 | 787.682 | 1 | 1087.455 |
|
2 | 2 | 15-3-1 | 2 | 703.945 | 2 | 932.403 |
|
3 | 3 | 16-3 | 3 | 685.879 | 3 | 887.243 |
|
4 | 4 | 13-2 | 6 | 644.926 | 4 | 868.021 |
|
5 | 5 | 15-2 | 5 | 647.639 | 5 | 810.193 |
|
6 | 6 | 12-3-2 | 4 | 651.204 | 6 | 804.530 |
|
7 | 7 | 10-2-3 | 7 | 630.849 | 7 | 801.797 |
|
8 | 8 | 11-5-1 | 8 | 621.617 | 8 | 792.398 |
|
9 | 9 | 11-3-1 | 10 | 591.772 | 9 | 746.331 |
|
10 | 10 | 10-3-2 | 9 | 603.382 | 10 | 697.536 |
|
11 | 11 | 10-5 | 11 | 563.365 | 12 | 631.932 |
|
12 | 12 | 9-6 | 13 | 542.596 | 11 | 647.613 |
|
13 | 13 | 10-5-3 | 15 | 536.242 | 13 | 631.257 |
|
14 | 14 | 7-5-3 | 14 | 539.123 | 14 | 627.389 |
|
15 | 15 | 9-5-2 | 12 | 550.947 | 16 | 586.425 |
|
16 | 16 | 8-6-2 | 17 | 526.058 | 15 | 587.713 |
|
17 | 17 | 6-7-2 | 16 | 535.305 | 18 | 578.594 |
|
18 | 8-5-2 | 19 | 502.821 | 17 | 584.214 | |
|
19 | 6-4-4 | 18 | 525.325 | 19 | 530.870 | |
|
20 | 7-4-3 | 23 | 486.126 | 20 | 526.514 | |
|
21 | 7-7 | 22 | 488.832 | 21 | 523.184 | |
|
18 | 22 | 5-6-2 | 20 | 501.992 | 23 | 487.095 |
|
23 | 6-4-2 | 21 | 490.513 | 24 | 483.562 | |
|
24 | 6-7-1 | 25 | 478.568 | 22 | 505.139 | |
|
25 | 7-7 | 24 | 479.284 | 25 | 469.620 | |
|
26 | 3-7-4 | 26 | 446.744 | 26 | 364.203 | |
|
27 | 4-8 | 30 | 412.465 | 27 | 357.394 | |
|
28 | 4-7-1 | 29 | 413.364 | 28 | 329.716 | |
|
29 | 3-9-3 | 28 | 425.312 | 30 | 310.193 | |
|
30 | 3-9-2 | 27 | 425.595 | 31 | 308.647 | |
|
31 | 3-10-1 | 31 | 395.929 | 29 | 324.376 | |
|
32 | 4-9 | 32 | 391.952 | 32 | 280.235 | |
|
33 | 2-9 | 34 | 378.153 | 33 | 261.493 | |
|
34 | 4-9 | 33 | 387.554 | 34 | 260.035 | |
|
35 | 1-13 | 37 | 335.496 | 35 | 189.295 | |
|
36 | 0-11-3 | 35 | 362.698 | 37 | 169.759 | |
|
37 | 0-9 | 38 | 326.126 | 36 | 184.152 | |
|
38 | 1-9 | 36 | 336.570 | 39 | 137.408 | |
|
39 | 0-8-1 | 39 | 315.215 | 38 | 146.893 | |
|
40 | 0-9-1 | 40 | 309.657 | 40 | 98.946 |
Legend
APR: The Adjusted Playoff Ranking (APR) is the bracket seed adjusted from final frozen ranking to remove first round same league matchup conflicts and to accommodate league champion guarantees.OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Effective Impact on RPI
The RPI formula uses a 1:1.86 ratio of WWP:OWP, the effective impact on a team's RPI for 3A/2A/1A Girls Soccer was:| Max | Min | Range | Effect | Weight | Impact | |
| WWP | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.449 | 69% |
| OWP | 0.673 | 0.432 | 0.242 | 0.449 | 31% |
