Oregon School Activities Association
Fall Team Sports Schedules, Scores, Rankings
Girls Volleyball | Girls Soccer | Boys Soccer | Football
Girls Volleyball | Girls Soccer | Boys Soccer | Football
2026 Football Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Football Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 2 | 711.162 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 3 | 708.333 |
|
3 | 2-1 | 1 | 900.000 | 5 | 682.956 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 2 | 791.667 | 8 | 658.161 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 12 | 566.667 | 1 | 738.621 |
|
6 | 1-1 | 5 | 662.500 | 16 | 541.977 |
|
7 | 2-1 | 13 | 543.750 | 9 | 653.088 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 5 | 662.500 | 18 | 511.301 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 11 | 575.000 | 13 | 598.785 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 23 | 458.333 | 4 | 699.178 |
|
11 | 2-1 | 13 | 543.750 | 14 | 595.741 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 6 | 668.732 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 10 | 627.500 | 21 | 506.249 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 7 | 668.019 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 10 | 651.223 |
|
16 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 11 | 651.082 |
|
17 | 1-1 | 17 | 500.000 | 19 | 509.746 |
|
18 | 0-2 | 7 | 650.000 | 29 | 344.973 |
|
19 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 12 | 650.456 |
|
20 | 2-1 | 22 | 466.667 | 15 | 568.052 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 17 | 500.000 | 20 | 508.366 |
|
22 | 0-2 | 7 | 650.000 | 30 | 341.799 |
|
23 | 1-1 | 16 | 535.000 | 22 | 499.674 |
|
24 | 0-2 | 7 | 650.000 | 32 | 329.953 |
|
25 | 1-2 | 24 | 425.000 | 25 | 454.912 |
|
26 | 0-3 | 15 | 541.667 | 34 | 314.293 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 31 | 330.277 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 33 | 326.668 |
|
29 | 2-1 | 36 | 218.750 | 17 | 531.829 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 35 | 299.669 |
|
31 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 23 | 480.815 |
|
32 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 24 | 458.333 |
|
33 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 26 | 450.919 |
|
34 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 27 | 446.419 |
|
35 | 1-1 | 37 | 175.000 | 28 | 429.256 |
|
36 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 36 | 298.383 |
|
37 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 37 | 291.667 |
|
38 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 38 | 287.532 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 39 | 274.970 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 40 | 274.375 |
|
41 | 0-3 | 30 | 325.000 | 41 | 210.776 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 837.500 | 5 | 741.855 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 6 | 783.333 | 1 | 825.549 |
|
3 | 3-0 | 6 | 783.333 | 4 | 758.689 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 8 | 760.417 | 3 | 776.998 |
|
5 | 3-0 | 10 | 675.000 | 2 | 777.129 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 10 | 675.000 | 6 | 729.272 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 4 | 790.000 | 12 | 575.535 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 2 | 825.000 | 14 | 559.317 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 9 | 683.333 | 8 | 629.172 |
|
10 | 1-1 | 2 | 825.000 | 15 | 545.099 |
|
11 | 1-1 | 4 | 790.000 | 17 | 541.667 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 17 | 512.500 | 7 | 697.041 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 13 | 662.500 | 18 | 540.251 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 9 | 627.107 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 25 | 350.000 | 10 | 625.000 |
|
16 | 1-2 | 12 | 672.917 | 23 | 459.311 |
|
17 | 2-1 | 23 | 450.000 | 13 | 566.066 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 18 | 500.000 | 20 | 501.890 |
|
19 | 0-2 | 14 | 650.000 | 24 | 375.000 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 28 | 337.500 | 11 | 586.466 |
|
21 | 2-1 | 23 | 450.000 | 16 | 542.309 |
|
22 | 0-2 | 14 | 650.000 | 25 | 371.990 |
|
23 | 0-2 | 14 | 650.000 | 26 | 360.270 |
|
24 | 2-1 | 27 | 341.667 | 19 | 518.203 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 27 | 343.944 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 28 | 326.297 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 29 | 298.293 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 30 | 295.539 |
|
29 | 1-1 | 28 | 337.500 | 22 | 491.070 |
|
30 | 2-1 | 33 | 250.000 | 21 | 494.474 |
|
31 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 31 | 290.582 |
|
32 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 33 | 277.569 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 34 | 162.500 | 32 | 280.061 |
|
34 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 36 | 253.169 |
|
35 | 0-2 | 34 | 162.500 | 35 | 254.905 |
|
36 | 0-2 | 36 | 0.000 | 34 | 259.397 |
|
37 | 0-2 | 36 | 0.000 | 37 | 248.873 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 2 | 745.551 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 837.500 | 1 | 761.701 |
|
3 | 2-0 | 3 | 837.500 | 3 | 741.525 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 6 | 660.714 |
|
5 | 2-1 | 6 | 666.667 | 8 | 607.026 |
|
6 | 3-0 | 12 | 566.667 | 4 | 729.202 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 5 | 825.000 | 11 | 566.518 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 6 | 666.667 | 13 | 560.717 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 11 | 575.000 | 10 | 579.370 |
|
10 | 1-1 | 17 | 500.000 | 7 | 636.478 |
|
11 | 1-1 | 8 | 662.500 | 17 | 495.936 |
|
12 | 1-1 | 13 | 535.000 | 15 | 522.527 |
|
13 | 2-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 5 | 664.509 |
|
14 | 1-2 | 9 | 658.333 | 20 | 461.022 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 13 | 535.000 | 18 | 482.143 |
|
16 | 2-1 | 20 | 466.667 | 12 | 563.668 |
|
17 | 2-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 9 | 589.286 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 17 | 500.000 | 16 | 497.874 |
|
19 | 1-1 | 13 | 535.000 | 25 | 418.530 |
|
20 | 1-2 | 16 | 533.333 | 23 | 439.778 |
|
21 | 0-2 | 10 | 650.000 | 30 | 346.297 |
|
22 | 2-1 | 28 | 341.667 | 14 | 523.089 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 21 | 456.250 | 24 | 422.236 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 29 | 337.500 | 21 | 458.315 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 19 | 487.500 | 31 | 290.091 |
|
26 | 1-1 | 32 | 175.000 | 19 | 461.501 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 23 | 425.000 | 28 | 408.630 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 30 | 302.500 | 22 | 450.189 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 26 | 347.917 | 27 | 409.435 |
|
30 | 0-3 | 22 | 433.333 | 32 | 275.555 |
|
31 | 1-2 | 26 | 347.917 | 29 | 384.469 |
|
32 | 1-1 | 33 | 140.000 | 26 | 409.683 |
|
33 | 0-3 | 31 | 216.667 | 33 | 208.447 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 2 | 770.277 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 6 | 783.333 | 1 | 807.924 |
|
3 | 2-0 | 3 | 837.500 | 4 | 746.865 |
|
4 | 2-1 | 7 | 777.778 | 3 | 770.018 |
|
5 | 2-1 | 2 | 883.333 | 8 | 664.279 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 8 | 675.000 | 6 | 713.240 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 4 | 825.000 | 12 | 571.838 |
|
8 | 1-1 | 4 | 825.000 | 13 | 542.462 |
|
9 | 3-0 | 16 | 458.333 | 5 | 728.933 |
|
10 | 2-0 | 14 | 512.500 | 7 | 701.852 |
|
11 | 1-2 | 9 | 672.917 | 18 | 449.712 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 19 | 350.000 | 9 | 656.477 |
|
13 | 1-0 | 19 | 350.000 | 10 | 604.718 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 19 | 350.000 | 11 | 594.590 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 15 | 500.000 | 16 | 525.871 |
|
16 | 2-1 | 12 | 575.000 | 19 | 446.780 |
|
17 | 0-1 | 10 | 650.000 | 21 | 415.622 |
|
18 | 2-1 | 17 | 450.000 | 15 | 538.130 |
|
19 | 0-2 | 10 | 650.000 | 23 | 357.696 |
|
20 | 1-2 | 18 | 425.000 | 17 | 500.000 |
|
21 | 1-2 | 13 | 564.583 | 22 | 403.250 |
|
22 | 2-1 | 22 | 327.083 | 14 | 542.014 |
|
23 | 1-1 | 24 | 175.000 | 20 | 433.554 |
|
24 | 0-2 | 23 | 325.000 | 25 | 279.555 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 25 | 162.500 | 26 | 267.857 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 25 | 162.500 | 27 | 237.051 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 29 | 100.000 | 24 | 333.468 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 25 | 162.500 | 28 | 232.920 |
|
29 | 0-3 | 28 | 108.333 | 30 | 183.320 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 30 | 0.000 | 29 | 191.756 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 2 | 769.858 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 3 | 891.667 | 1 | 863.416 |
|
3 | 2-1 | 2 | 892.308 | 7 | 699.481 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 3 | 716.673 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 4 | 710.189 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 5 | 710.083 |
|
7 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 6 | 708.333 |
|
8 | 2-0 | 7 | 675.000 | 8 | 695.556 |
|
9 | 1-1 | 4 | 825.000 | 14 | 551.596 |
|
10 | 1-1 | 5 | 790.000 | 15 | 541.667 |
|
11 | 1-1 | 6 | 697.500 | 17 | 535.122 |
|
12 | 2-1 | 15 | 558.333 | 12 | 598.869 |
|
13 | 2-1 | 14 | 575.000 | 13 | 589.211 |
|
14 | 1-1 | 13 | 643.056 | 18 | 527.836 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 9 | 671.168 |
|
16 | 2-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 10 | 653.236 |
|
17 | 2-0 | 26 | 350.000 | 11 | 640.223 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 18 | 500.000 | 19 | 504.150 |
|
19 | 1-1 | 18 | 500.000 | 21 | 495.417 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 17 | 535.000 | 22 | 485.088 |
|
21 | 1-1 | 24 | 465.000 | 16 | 540.460 |
|
22 | 0-2 | 12 | 650.000 | 28 | 345.339 |
|
23 | 1-1 | 18 | 500.000 | 23 | 482.298 |
|
24 | 0-3 | 16 | 541.667 | 27 | 362.541 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 20 | 500.000 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 21 | 487.500 | 30 | 339.331 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 21 | 487.500 | 31 | 314.519 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 21 | 487.500 | 32 | 309.773 |
|
29 | 1-2 | 29 | 333.333 | 26 | 405.298 |
|
30 | 1-1 | 34 | 175.000 | 24 | 458.333 |
|
31 | 1-1 | 35 | 140.000 | 25 | 436.525 |
|
32 | 0-3 | 25 | 433.333 | 36 | 251.121 |
|
33 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 33 | 299.926 |
|
34 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 34 | 298.424 |
|
35 | 1-2 | 36 | 131.250 | 29 | 341.485 |
|
36 | 0-2 | 30 | 325.000 | 35 | 291.667 |
|
37 | 0-2 | 37 | 0.000 | 37 | 194.502 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 2-0 | 1 | 837.500 | 1 | 770.617 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 3 | 700.661 |
|
3 | 1-1 | 5 | 662.500 | 4 | 688.667 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 6 | 669.505 |
|
5 | 1-2 | 2 | 757.692 | 9 | 577.228 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 6 | 652.083 | 8 | 608.042 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 12 | 512.500 | 5 | 681.439 |
|
8 | 3-0 | 17 | 458.333 | 2 | 734.351 |
|
9 | 2-0 | 11 | 620.833 | 12 | 500.000 |
|
10 | 1-2 | 10 | 641.667 | 14 | 474.428 |
|
11 | 2-1 | 16 | 458.974 | 10 | 575.338 |
|
12 | 1-1 | 13 | 500.000 | 13 | 474.602 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 7 | 650.000 | 19 | 400.220 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 20 | 350.000 | 7 | 646.329 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 7 | 650.000 | 20 | 393.813 |
|
16 | 0-2 | 7 | 650.000 | 24 | 331.942 |
|
17 | 1-2 | 22 | 310.000 | 11 | 566.001 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 19 | 372.500 | 15 | 452.243 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 18 | 418.333 | 18 | 402.424 |
|
20 | 0-2 | 14 | 487.500 | 22 | 358.446 |
|
21 | 0-2 | 14 | 487.500 | 23 | 334.558 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 24 | 210.000 | 16 | 445.162 |
|
23 | 1-1 | 25 | 175.000 | 17 | 441.015 |
|
24 | 1-2 | 23 | 225.000 | 21 | 367.169 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 21 | 325.000 | 25 | 253.374 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 26 | 0.000 | 26 | 233.635 |
|
27 | 0-2 | 26 | 0.000 | 27 | 228.904 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
| Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 1 | 765.447 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 3 | 675.000 | 2 | 724.096 |
|
3 | 1-1 | 1 | 825.000 | 7 | 555.959 |
|
4 | 1-1 | 3 | 675.000 | 6 | 650.611 |
|
5 | 1-1 | 1 | 825.000 | 8 | 547.928 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 10 | 512.500 | 3 | 704.852 |
|
7 | 2-0 | 12 | 350.000 | 4 | 669.722 |
|
8 | 2-0 | 12 | 350.000 | 5 | 652.008 |
|
9 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 13 | 367.575 |
|
10 | 1-2 | 9 | 564.583 | 11 | 451.833 |
|
11 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 14 | 348.454 |
|
12 | 0-2 | 6 | 650.000 | 15 | 330.432 |
|
13 | 1-1 | 14 | 337.500 | 9 | 467.617 |
|
14 | 1-2 | 11 | 412.500 | 12 | 403.703 |
|
15 | 1-1 | 16 | 155.556 | 10 | 458.390 |
|
16 | 0-1 | 17 | 0.000 | 16 | 322.539 |
|
17 | 0-2 | 15 | 325.000 | 18 | 277.599 |
|
18 | 0-1 | 17 | 0.000 | 17 | 301.234 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
